Introduction
A finance lease is a lease that transfers substantially all risks and rewards of ownership to the lessee. The lessor in a finance lease derecognises the asset and recognises a receivable. All other leases are operating leases, where the asset is retained on the lessor's balance sheet and lease income is recognised on a straight-line basis.
IFRS 16, which replaced IAS 17 in January 2019, introduced significant changes to the accounting treatment of leases. The difference between finance leases and operating leases remains crucial for lessors, but for lessees, the standard requires most leases to be recognised in the statement of financial position.
This article explores the key differences between finance and operating leases under IFRS 16 and forms part of our full IFRS 16 guide.
Definitions
The fundamental distinction between finance and operating leases lies in the transfer of risks and rewards:
Finance Lease
A lease that transfers substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of an underlying asset.
Operating Lease
A lease that does not transfer substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of an underlying asset.
Treatment for Lessees
Under IFRS 16, lessees no longer classify leases as finance or operating leases. Instead, they:
- Record a right-of-use asset
- Recognise a corresponding lease liability
The following leases are exempt from the treatment above, and are still recognised through profit and loss:
- Short-term leases (12 months or less)
- Leases for low-value assets
The distinction between finance and operating leases is no longer relevant for lessees, as both types are recognised similarly to finance leases under the previous standard (IAS 17).
Treatment for Lessors
Classification Criteria
A lease is classified as a finance lease if it meets one or more of the following criteria:
| Criterion | Description |
|---|---|
| Ownership Transfer | Ownership transfers to the lessee at the end of the lease term |
| Purchase Option | The lessee has a purchase option that is reasonably certain to be exercised |
| Lease Term | The lease term covers the major part of the asset's economic life |
| Present Value | The present value of lease payments equals or exceeds substantially all the fair value of the asset |
| Specialised Nature | The leased asset is of a specialised nature and has no alternative use to the lessor |
Finance Lease Treatment
- Derecognise the leased asset
- Recognise a receivable equal to the net investment in the lease
- Record interest income over the lease term
- Capitalise initial direct costs (excluding manufacturer or dealer lessors)
- For manufacturer or dealer lessors: recognise revenue, cost of sales, and profit/loss
Operating Lease Treatment
- Retain the underlying asset in the statement of financial position
- Recognise rental income on a straight-line basis
- Capitalise initial direct costs as part of the underlying asset
- For right-of-use assets sublet as operating leases: apply IAS 40 Investment Property
Land and Buildings: One Contract, Two Classifications
Classification is not applied to the contract as a whole. Where a lease covers both land and a building, IFRS 16.B55–B57 requires the lessor to assess each element separately against the criteria in paragraphs 62–66.
Land normally has an indefinite economic life. A 20-year lease over land therefore fails the "major part of the economic life" test almost automatically, and the present value of the payments attributable to the land rarely amounts to substantially all of its fair value. The practical result is that the land element is an operating lease while the building element is frequently a finance lease — inside a single contract, at a single commencement date.
Splitting the instalment
The lease payments (including any lump-sum upfront payment) are allocated between the two elements in proportion to the relative fair values of the leasehold interests in the land and in the building at the inception date. Note what is being weighted: the value of the right to use each element for the lease term, not the standalone fair values of the land and the building.
If the payments cannot be allocated reliably, the entire lease is classified as a finance lease — unless it is clear that both elements are operating leases, in which case the whole contract is an operating lease.
What the split does to the lessor's books
| Element | Classification | Lessor accounting |
|---|---|---|
| Building | Usually finance | Derecognise the building; recognise a net investment in the lease; recognise finance income over the lease term |
| Land | Usually operating | Retain the land, reclassified out of property, plant and equipment because it is now held to earn rentals; straight-line the allocated rental; recognise the allocated initial direct costs as an expense over the lease term |
The reclassification journal on the land element is simply:
Dr Land - Investment property x
Cr Land - Property, plant and equipment x
Why this matters more than it looks
If the lessor applies the fair value model in IAS 40, splitting a property lease moves part of the asset onto a measurement basis that runs fair value gains and losses through profit or loss. A classification judgement made once, at inception, then drives reported earnings for the rest of the lease term — and the volatility lands only on the land portion.
Practical Example: Classifying a Lease
Scenario
ABC Leasing Company leases manufacturing equipment to XYZ Manufacturing with the following terms:
- Asset fair value: R1,000,000
- Lease term: 8 years
- Asset economic life: 10 years
- Annual lease payment: R150,000 (payable in arrears)
- Residual value guarantee: None
- Purchase option: Lessee can purchase for R50,000 at end of lease (significantly below expected fair value of R200,000)
- Discount rate: 8%
Analysis
Let's apply the classification criteria:
1. Ownership Transfer? No - ownership doesn't automatically transfer at lease end.
2. Purchase Option Reasonably Certain? Yes - R50,000 purchase option when asset will be worth R200,000 is a bargain purchase option that's reasonably certain to be exercised.
3. Lease Term vs Economic Life? 8 years / 10 years = 80% - covers major part of economic life.
4. Present Value Test:
- PV of lease payments: R150,000 × 5.747 (PV annuity factor, 8 years, 8%) = R862,050
- Plus: PV of purchase option: R50,000 × 0.540 (PV factor, 8 years, 8%) = R27,000
- Total PV: R889,050 = 89% of fair value
5. Specialised Asset? Not mentioned, assume no.
Conclusion
This lease meets multiple criteria (bargain purchase option, major part of economic life, and substantially all fair value). ABC Leasing should classify this as a finance lease.
Accounting Treatment
At lease commencement, ABC Leasing will:
Dr Net investment in the lease 889,050
Cr Equipment 1,000,000
Cr Profit on disposal (To be calculated based on cost)
Over the lease term:
- Recognise interest income using the effective interest method
- The interest income will be front-loaded (higher in early years)
- Each lease payment will reduce the net investment in the lease
If this were an operating lease instead:
- Equipment remains on balance sheet at R1,000,000
- Depreciate over 10 years: R100,000 per year
- Recognise rental income: R150,000 per year (straight-line)
- Net income per year: R50,000 (R150,000 - R100,000)
The Discount Rate Decides the Present Value Test
The example above hands you an 8% rate. Real classifications rarely do, and the rate is not a neutral input — it is the variable that most often decides whether a borderline lease is a finance lease or an operating lease.
The rate used in the present value test is the interest rate implicit in the lease, and it is defined from the lessor's perspective: the rate at which the present value of the lease payments and the unguaranteed residual value equals the fair value of the underlying asset plus the lessor's initial direct costs. Three consequences follow that classification checklists rarely spell out.
1. Initial direct costs push a lease towards finance lease classification
Initial direct costs sit on the same side of the equation as the fair value of the asset. Adding them means the same stream of lease payments must be discounted at a lower rate to reconcile. A lower rate produces a higher present value of the lease payments — and that is precisely the figure tested against "substantially all of the fair value".
A marginal lease carrying material commission or legal costs can therefore tip into finance lease classification because of costs the lessee never sees. It also explains how a manufacturer or dealer lessor can reach a different conclusion on identical terms: those lessors exclude initial direct costs from the net investment (IFRS 16.69) and are required to use a market rate of interest, which strips out the artificially low implicit rate that would otherwise inflate selling profit.
2. Guaranteed and unguaranteed residual values are not interchangeable
Both amounts appear in the implicit rate calculation, but only one of them counts in the present value test:
| Amount | In the implicit rate calculation | In the present value test | In the gross investment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guaranteed residual value | Yes | Yes — it is a lease payment | Yes |
| Unguaranteed residual value | Yes | No | Yes |
Converting R200,000 of expected residual from unguaranteed to guaranteed does not change the economics of the arrangement by a cent. It does move R200,000, discounted, straight into the numerator of the present value test — which is why residual value guarantees are so often the deciding factor. See residual values under IFRS 16.
3. In South Africa, VAT changes the payment stream being discounted
Where the contract is an instalment credit agreement, the lessor levies output VAT on the cash value at commencement and pays it to SARS immediately, recovering it from the lessee over the lease term. The lessor is therefore financing that VAT: it is an outflow on day one, and the lease payments used in the calculation are VAT-inclusive.
Under an ordinary rental agreement, VAT is levied on each payment and never belongs to the lessor, so the payments used are VAT-exclusive. The residual value is VAT-exclusive in both cases.
Operating Lease Mechanics for Lessors
The operating lease looks like the simpler outcome. In practice it produces more recurring errors, because three separate items have to be spread across the lease term at the same time.
1. Income is straight-lined net of incentives
Lease income is recognised on a straight-line basis over the lease term unless another systematic basis is more representative (IFRS 16.81). Lease incentives granted reduce that income and are spread over the same term — they are never an expense of the period in which they are paid:
Straight-line income per period =
(Total lease payments over the term - incentives granted) x 100/115 x 1/n
The 100/115 factor removes VAT where payments are quoted inclusive; n is the number of periods in
the lease term.
Cash received rarely equals income recognised, so the difference accumulates in a lease income received in advance or in arrears account. With straight-line income of R52,000 and an actual receipt of R57,500 including VAT:
Dr Bank 57,500
Dr Lease income received in arrears 2,000
Cr VAT control 7,500
Cr Lease income 52,000
An incentive paid to the lessee is recognised in the same account rather than in profit or loss:
Dr Lease income received in arrears 30,000
Dr VAT control 4,500
Cr Bank 34,500
2. Initial direct costs are added to the asset
Initial direct costs incurred in obtaining an operating lease are added to the carrying amount of the underlying asset and recognised as an expense over the lease term on the same basis as the lease income (IFRS 16.83). Compare this with the finance lease, where those same costs disappear into the net investment and are recovered through finance income — which is why identical costs on two identical assets can produce quite different expense profiles.
3. The asset stays on the balance sheet, and may need reclassifying
The lessor continues to depreciate the asset in line with its normal policy for similar assets (IFRS 16.84). Where the asset is land or a building now held to earn rentals, it meets the definition of investment property and is accounted for under IAS 40.
The earnings profile is the real difference
An operating lessor reports a broadly flat net margin — straight-lined income less straight-line depreciation. A finance lessor reports front-loaded finance income on a declining net investment. On the same asset, over the same term, the total profit is similar; the timing is not, and it is the timing that moves reported earnings, covenants and performance measures.
How the Classifications Diverge in the Notes
The two classifications produce entirely different note disclosures, and the finance lease note carries a reconciliation that the operating lease note does not.
Finance lease: reconcile the payments to the net investment
A lessor discloses a maturity analysis of the lease payments receivable, showing the undiscounted payments for a minimum of each of the first five years and a total for the remaining years, and must reconcile those undiscounted payments to the net investment in the lease — identifying the unearned finance income and any discounted unguaranteed residual value (IFRS 16.94):
| Maturity analysis of lease payments receivable | R |
|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5,039,036 |
| Year 2 | 5,039,036 |
| Year 3 | 5,039,036 |
| Year 4 | 5,039,036 |
| Year 5 | 7,539,036 |
| Total undiscounted lease payments | 27,695,180 |
| Unearned finance income | (4,215,274) |
| Discounted unguaranteed residual value | 376,082 |
| Net investment in the lease | 23,855,988 |
The finance lessor also discloses selling profit or loss where it is a manufacturer or dealer, finance income on the net investment, and a qualitative and quantitative explanation of significant changes in the net investment (IFRS 16.93) — usually presented as a roll-forward from opening balance through new leases, capital repaid and finance income to closing balance.
Operating lease: undiscounted payments only
The operating lessor discloses a maturity analysis of the undiscounted lease payments to be received, on the same annual basis, but there is nothing to reconcile it to — no receivable exists (IFRS 16.97):
| Undiscounted lease payments receivable | R |
|---|---|
| Year 1 | 800,000 |
| Year 2 | 1,000,000 |
| Year 3 | 1,200,000 |
| Total | 3,000,000 |
The asset itself remains in the property, plant and equipment or investment property note, and the lease income is disclosed in profit or loss. For the full picture, see our guide to IFRS 16 disclosures.
Tax, Deferred Tax and Group Consequences
Classification is an accounting judgement, but its consequences run well beyond the lease note.
The tax base does not follow the accounting
Unless the contract is an instalment sale for tax purposes, the lessor remains the owner of the asset for income tax and continues to claim wear-and-tear on it — even though the asset has been derecognised from the statement of financial position. A finance lease therefore produces an asset with a tax base and no carrying amount, and a net investment whose tax base is the amount that will not be taxable in future: typically the portion of the next payment already taxed on a day-to-day accrual basis, plus, under an instalment credit agreement, the VAT attributable to future payments.
An operating lease produces the opposite pattern. The lease income received in arrears asset will be taxed in full when received, so its tax base is nil and the whole carrying amount is a taxable temporary difference. Our article on tax on leases in South Africa works through both.
The distinction still reaches lessees
Lessees no longer classify leases, but the character of the contract still shapes their numbers. Under an instalment credit agreement, VAT is levied at commencement and forms part of the lease liability, and the lessee claims the input tax on the cash value up front. Under a rental agreement, VAT is levied on each payment, sits outside the liability, and is claimed as each payment is made. The right-of-use asset and the lease liability differ in amount on day one on otherwise identical terms.
Intra-group leases hinge on the classification
Within a group, the lessor's classification determines what has to be undone on consolidation. If the lessor classifies the lease as an operating lease and the asset is a property, it becomes investment property in the lessor's own books, with fair value adjustments running through profit or loss. Those adjustments would never have arisen from the group's perspective, so they must be reversed on consolidation, together with the rental income, the lessee's right-of-use asset, lease liability, depreciation and finance cost, and the deferred tax on each. See intercompany leases under IFRS 16.
Practical Challenges
Key Implementation Challenges
- Exercising judgment in lease classification
- Collecting comprehensive lease data
- Managing multiple lease agreements
- Determining appropriate discount rates
- Handling lease modifications
Classifying and scheduling leases in Excel?
Leash automates lease schedules, journal entries, and IFRS 16 compliance, so you're not rebuilding this in Excel every month-end.
Conclusion
IFRS 16 has significantly changed lease accounting, particularly for lessees. While lessors continue to distinguish between finance and operating leases, lessees now recognise most leases on their balance sheet. Understanding these requirements is crucial for:
- Accurate financial reporting
- Compliance with accounting standards
- Effective lease management
- Stakeholder communication
For any clarification, guidance, or feedback on our article, please reach out to us on insight@leash.co.za.