Leash.

ASC 842 Finance Lease vs Operating Lease: Explained With Examples

Introduction

ASC 842 requires nearly all leases to be recognized on the balance sheet as a right-of-use (ROU) asset and a lease liability. The distinction between a finance lease and an operating lease does not affect balance-sheet recognition, but affects expense recognition, ROU asset depreciation, and cash-flow classification.

In short:

  • Finance leases recognize interest expense and depreciation separately
  • Operating leases recognize a single lease cost, even though interest and depreciation are still calculated internally

For finance leases, depreciation expense is usually recorded on a straight-line basis, while interest is higher at the start of the lease, leading to a more front-loaded expense profile. Under operating leases, the total expense profile is smoothed over the lease term.

Lessee Lease Classification Under ASC 842

A lease is a finance lease if any of the following are met:

  • Ownership transfers at end of term
  • Purchase option reasonably certain to be exercised
  • Lease term covers a major part of the asset’s economic life
  • Present value of payments equals substantially all of the asset’s fair value
  • Asset is specialized with no alternative use to the lessor

If none apply, the lease is an operating lease.

Core Accounting Difference

AreaFinance LeaseOperating Lease
Balance SheetROU asset + lease liabilityROU asset + lease liability
Income StatementInterest + depreciationSingle lease expense
Expense PatternFront-loadedStraight-line
ROU Asset ReductionStraight-line depreciationAccelerating reduction
Cash FlowPrincipal = financingPayments = operating

Operating Lease Accounting — How the Single Lease Expense Works

Although operating leases show one straight-line lease expense, lessees still need to calculate interest on the lease liability each period.

Key Concept

For an operating lease:

  • Depreciation of the ROU asset is a balancing figure

  • It is calculated as:

    • Straight-line lease expense − Interest on lease liability = ROU asset depreciation

This produces:

  • Straight-line total lease cost
  • Accelerating reduction of the ROU asset
  • Declining interest expense over time

Operating Lease Example

Assumptions

  • 5-year operating lease
  • Annual payments: $10,000
  • Discount rate: 5%
  • Initial lease liability & ROU asset: $43,295
  • Straight-line lease expense: $10,000 per year

Year 1 Calculations

  • Interest: $43,295 × 5% = $2,165
  • ROU depreciation (balancing figure):
    $10,000 − $2,165 = $7,835

Year 1 Journal Entries

Recognise lease liability and ROU asset:

Dr Right-of-use Asset         43,295
Cr Lease Liability                    43,295 

Lease expense:

Dr Lease Expense              10,000
Cr Lease Liability (interest)         2,165
Cr ROU Asset (depreciation)           7,835

Key Observations

  • Lease expense is constant every year
  • Interest declines each period
  • ROU asset is reduced by more each year as interest decreases

This is why operating lease ROU assets decline faster over time, even though expense remains straight-line.

Finance Lease Accounting — Separate Interest and Depreciation

For a finance lease, expense recognition mirrors asset financing.

Key Characteristics

  • Interest expense calculated on the lease liability (higher at start of the lease)
  • Straight-line depreciation of the ROU asset

Finance Lease Example (Same Terms)

  • ROU asset: $43,295
  • Useful life = lease term (5 years)

Recognise lease liability and ROU asset:

Dr Right-of-use Asset         43,295
Cr Lease Liability                    43,295 

Annual Depreciation:
$43,295 ÷ 5 = $8,659 per year

Year 1 Interest:
$43,295 × 5% = $2,165

Year 1 Journal Entries

Record interest:

Dr Interest Expense           2,165
Cr Lease Liability                    2,165

Record depreciation:

Dr Depreciation Expense       8,659
Cr Accumulated Depreciation           8,659

Record lease payment:

Dr Lease Liability            10,000
Cr Cash                               10,000

Result

  • Total Year 1 expense: $10,824
  • Expense declines over time as interest decreases
  • ROU asset declines evenly

Operating vs Finance Lease — Side-by-Side Summary

FeatureOperating LeaseFinance Lease
Total Expense PatternStraight-lineFront-loaded
Interest Shown SeparatelyNo (embedded)Yes
Depreciation MethodBalancing figureStraight-line
ROU Asset ReductionAcceleratingEven
EBITDA ImpactLowerHigher

Why This Distinction Matters

  • EBITDA and operating income can differ materially
  • ROU asset behavior affects balance-sheet trends
  • Covenants and KPIs can change based on classification
  • Misunderstanding operating lease mechanics is a common audit issue

Conclusion

Under ASC 842, finance and operating leases are similar in the sense that both are recorded “on balance sheet”. The defining difference is how expense is recognized and how the ROU asset is reduced — straight-line via a balancing figure for operating leases, and traditional interest plus depreciation for finance leases.

For clarification, guidance, or feedback on our article, please reach out to us at insight@leash.co.za.

Have a Question?

Ask us anything about this article

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about this topic

The main difference under ASC 842 is how lease expense is recognised. Finance leases recognise interest and depreciation separately, while operating leases recognise a single straight-line lease expense.

Yes. ASC 842 requires both finance leases and operating leases to be recognised on the balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and a lease liability.

Finance leases result in a front-loaded expense pattern due to higher interest at the start of the lease, while operating leases produce a straight-line total lease expense over the lease term.

For operating leases, ROU asset depreciation is a balancing figure equal to straight-line lease expense minus interest, which causes the ROU asset to decline faster over time as interest decreases.

Interest is calculated on the lease liability each period but is not presented separately. It is embedded within the single lease expense recognised in the income statement.

For finance leases, the principal portion of payments is classified as a financing activity, while operating lease payments are classified as operating cash flows.

Yes. Operating leases generally result in lower EBITDA because lease expense is included in operating costs, while finance leases increase EBITDA since interest and depreciation are excluded.

A lease is classified as a finance lease if it transfers ownership, includes a reasonably certain purchase option, covers a major part of the asset’s economic life, represents substantially all of the asset’s fair value, or involves a specialised asset.

Straight-line depreciation is used for finance leases. For operating leases, ROU asset depreciation is not straight-line but instead acts as a balancing figure.

Operating lease accounting is often misunderstood because interest and depreciation are calculated internally but only a single lease expense is presented, leading to errors in ROU asset rollforwards.